<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 100 Prospects Review (50-41)</title>
	<link>http://www.thebaseballhub.com/uncategorized/top-100-prospects-review-50-41</link>
	<description>Baseball opinion, insight and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 21:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.thebaseballhub.com/uncategorized/top-100-prospects-review-50-41#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 17:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebaseballhub.com/uncategorized/top-100-prospects-review-50-41#comment-393</guid>
		<description>After a lot of digging... ok, a random fluke, it turns out that the missing prospect (#44) is LF Wlad Balentien from the Seattle Mariners, who was having an excellent season at AAA and due to major league service time will not be eligible for today's list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a lot of digging&#8230; ok, a random fluke, it turns out that the missing prospect (#44) is LF Wlad Balentien from the Seattle Mariners, who was having an excellent season at AAA and due to major league service time will not be eligible for today&#8217;s list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

